Showing posts with label real estate in Seattle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label real estate in Seattle. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

New Home Sales Jump… Surge… Soar… Hop or just Mosey Along?

The Commerce Department report on new home construction came out this morning - with all the excitement of watching for your horse to cross the finish line. About the same time Robert Shiller, of the Case Shiller HomePrice reports, stepped back from his more dour stance and allowed that housing may have hit bottom.
Nationwide new construction contracts (not closed sales, but signed contracts for purchase - subject to cancellations and other market forces) were up 9.6% , or 433,000 units per year. They were up - compared to last month’s numbers. But compared to July 2008, they were down 13.4%. That was the month Barron’s ran their well-reasoned analysis: “Bottom’s Up: This Real-Estate Rout May be Short-Lived.”http://online.barrons.com/article/SB121581623724947273.html

At any rate, the stock market gave a little yawn and then went on about its business.  Did I mention that new home sales account for about 7% of total sales volume? In addition, it is one of the most dramatically revised numbers that Commerce releases.
To get a large sense of scale, we can go back to July of 2005, when annual closed sales, not just contracts, came in at 1,370,000 units per year. A drop of 68% from there and 2005 wasn't as good as 2004!
Seattle tends to lag the rest of the country in slowdowns and in pickups. July new construction sales were down in King County from the same time last year – 526 units compared to 636 last year. The median price of listed new homes ($495,000) was $60,000 less than last year. The number of closed new homes was also lower: 280 vs 315. Median price of sold homes was $422,475 this July vs. $435,000 last July.
We can see that some of the builders’ subsidized interest rates, the first-time home buyers’10% tax credit (up to $8,000), the huge infusions of money used to keep mortgage rates low, not to mention declining home prices, are having a definite effect on the housing market. Yet it seems premature to be still feeling around for bottoms. Even though this follows the olde timey summer ritual, when the best half-year of buying and selling hits a seasonal crescendo in July, just in time for everyone to go on vacation or get ready for the relatives. Happens year in and year out, giving us plenty of high-octane hope for the more serious autumn season. Until then, enjoy the last golden rays here in sunny Seattle.

Thursday, August 6, 2009

Lions and Tigers and Trips to Rome.......

What do lions and tigers and trips have to do with real estate, you might wonder.
That’s what I was wondering when I read an open house flyer promising a trip to Rome – roundtrip for two – as a reward for selling a lovely $800,000 home.
That’s way up on the scale of inducements most real estate agents are used to. Starbucks cards and cold spreads used to be the standard inducements for previewing homes. During the summer of $4-a-gallon-gasoline, gas cards were a big lure. Some agents even gave out cold cash to preview their listings as home sales slowed to a crawl.
One Eastside builder offered a week in Hawaii for closing a set number of sales; others gave out week-end stays at exclusive resorts to reward sales. Now we have open houses complete with barbecues, gorgeous catered spreads, live music, a free bar and even drawings for pricey prizes.

The report on July home sales in Seattle tells us the number of home sales increased by about 10%, while the median price is down almost 14% from a year ago. The real kicker is that sales in the least expensive area of Southwest King County were up 54%, while on the Eastside ,where homes cost twice as much, sales were up less than 2%. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/realestate/2009607020_homesales06.html

This may be a bit simplistic, but doesn’t it make more sense to take that round-trip airfare for two to Rome and back and apply it to a price reduction of the home? After all, it is the home we want to sell! This may not put the house into another price range, but at this point in time, every bit helps.

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Home Prices in Dollars and in Gold

Gold vs Dollar

For a long time I wondered why the prices of homes moved so much faster then the prices of other things. In the seventies they started acting more like Aladdin’s lamps than houses. No matter how much we wanted out of them, they never said no. We didn’t even have to polish them up and poof, more money came out of them.

Say you were fortunate enough to buy a nice house in a nice area of Seattle for $20,000. In the year of 1970. Ten years later you check around and it’s worth $80,000. Forty years later it gets even better - the going price is $510,000. It’s the same house, the same street - no fancy upgrades or gentrification.

Over the years I’ve heard lots of casual explanations for this incredible feat of making money out of thin air. Supply and demand was one stock answer. But we didn’t have the tsunami of immigrants to the state that would have caused house to quadruple the decade of the 1970’s. Another answer was inflation. Budget & Labor Statistics figures, (http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm )tell us that any other basket of goodies costing $20,000 in 1970 would cost $111,800 in today’s dollars. That discrepancy of $400,000 means that we’ve got inflation plus something else.

During the 1980’s both spouses began working, sometimes doubling the income of single households. Better yet, DINKS (double income, no kids) came along and could afford bigger house payments. That explained where the money to pay for the bigger mortgages came from. But why the rising prices in the first place?

Might it be that the government policies of ever more generous tax breaks for home-owners encouraged ever growing demand? In the 1970’s you were taxed at the capital gains rates on your gain when you sold your home; you could carry forward your gains to the next house and so on and on and you’d never pay a cent in taxes. Not to mention the write-off for mortgage interest and taxes.

In the 1990‘s it got even better. Each land-owning citizen became entitled to keep $250,000 of gain tax free. This allowance could be repeated every 2 years. It didn’t matter whether you carried that gain forward into another home or spent it on a camel caravan to Timbuktu. These were powerful incentives to buy and gave some compensation for the pain of rising prices. They maybe accelerated the process, but they hardly caused it.
I’ve heard a few Seattleites say it’s all Bill Gates’ fault, bidding up house prices to the level of a Boston or a Silicon Valley. Ah, but that came later, much later than the 400% appreciation we saw by 1980. Mr Softy’s millionaires piled on later and then we all kept rubbing the lamp.
Recently I came across an article that put 1971 into perspective

In the early 1960s, Charles de Gaulle induced the Bank of France to convert large amounts of dollar reserves into gold. The reasoning was that the reserve currency role of the U.S. dollar was being seriously undermined by large U.S. balance of payments deficits that were inflationary under the gold-dollar international monetary system.
The French … bought their gold at $35/oz from the U.S. Treasury. The dollar remained under pressure for some years, leading President Nixon to abandon the gold-dollar peg and convertibility of the dollar into gold in August 1971. Over the next eight years, gold rose in a series of moves to $1,000/oz, not far from today’s level. Price inflation in the U.S. and other major countries soared to almost 15% at the peak in the 1970s.
http://www.boeckhinvestmentletter.com/newsletters/

The cost of that $20,000 house in gold was 571 oz at the 1971 rate of $35 an ounce. At the time $35 seemed a reasonable price, as gold had held a steady $20.67/oz from 1880 to 1932! From the 1930’s till 1971 it bounced between $35 - $45/oz.
A mere ten years later (1980)the price of our house went to $80,000 and gold had climbed to $600 an ounce. It would have taken only 133 oz of gold to buy it. The dollar price went up 400%; the price in gold went down by that much.

Fast forward to 2009 and same house is valued at $510,000. Take out the inflation on the original price ($90,000) and you have a $400,000 price tag. At today’s $950 oz, that’s 421 oz - enough to buy the house and $142,500 left over.

So far gold has preserved its purchasing power better than dollars. If gold were to go to $1000 oz this year and the dollar house price remains the same (both seem quite probable), anyone who held that original 571 oz would be even farther ahead.

Going off the gold standard removed any predictable limit to dollar prices of any investment - equities, homes, commodities. Perhaps one day the lack of appetite for dollars will provide a limit.